|
In the wake of September 11 attacks on the U.S., more and more countries are of the view that giving more regards to developing countries is very important for world trade and world’s stability.(62) Therefore, it is optimistic for developing countries to defend their interests on anti-dumping issue in the new round of multilateral trade negotiation.
APPENDIX A
Table 1
Summary of Anti-Dumping Actions, 1 July 1999-30 June 20001
APPENDIX B
Table 2
Exporters subject to two1 or more initiations of anti-dumping investigations,
1 July 1999-30 June 20002
Reference:
1. Areement on Anti-dumping Measures Art 2.
2. Areement on Anti-dumping Measures Art 5.2.
3. Greg Mastel Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy (M.E. Sharpe, Inc, New York, 2001) 17-27.
4. Greg Mastel Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy (M.E. Sharpe, Inc, New York, 2001) 3.
5. J. Michael Finger (ed) Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt (4ed, the University of Michigan Press, Michigan, 2001) 57.
6. Thomas J. Prusa “The Trade Effects of U.S. Antidumping Actions” (1996) 5440 NBER Working Paper Series 1, 18
7. Annex VII to the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
8. Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Art 27.2.
9. J. Michael Finger (ed) Antidumping: How it works and who gets hurt (4 ed, the University of Michigan Press, Michigan) 10.
10 .World Trade Organisation Annual Report 2001 (WTO Publications, Geneva, 2001) 65.
11. World Trade Organisation Annual Report 2001 (WTO Publications, Geneva, 2001) 65
12. J. Michael Finger (ed) Antidumping: How it works and who gets hurt (4 ed, the University of Michigan Press, Michigan) 11.
13. Greg Mastel Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy (M.E. Sharpe, Inc, New York, 2001) 30.
14. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Preparing for Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Issues and Research Needs from a Development Perspective (United Nations, Geneva, 2001) 123.
15. J. Michael Finger (ed) Antidumping: How it works and who gets hurt (4 ed, the University of Michigan Press, Michigan) 6.
16. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Preparing for Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Issues and Research Needs from a Development Perspective (United Nations, Geneva, 2001) 125.
17. World Trade Organisation Annual Report 2001 (WTO Publications, Geneva, 2001) 40.
18. Frans Engering, Hans De Brabander and Edwin Vermulst “EC Antidumping Policy in a Globalizing World---A Dutch Perspective” (1998) 32 J.W.T. 6 115, 116.
19. Brink Lindsy “The US Antidumping Law---Rhetoric versus Reality” (2000) 34 J.W.T. 1 1, 11.
20. Donghui Fu “EC Anti-Dumping Law and Individual Treatment Policy in Cases involving Imports from China” (1997) 31 J.W.T. 1 73, 91.
21. Ministry of Commerce Trade Remedies and the GATT: The Outcome of the Uruguay Round: Consultation Paper (Wellington, 1994)
22. Jianyu Wang “A Critique of the Application to China of the Non-market Economy Rules of Antidumping Legislation and Practice of the European Union” (1999) 33 J.W.T 3 117,120.
23. Donghui Fu “EC Anti-Dumping Law and Individual Treatment Policy in Cases involving Imports from China” (1997) 31 J.W.T. 1 73, 82.
24. Greg Mastel Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy (M.E. Sharpe, Inc, New York, 2001) 55.
25. Agreement on Anti-dumping Measures 1994 Art 2.1.
26. Agreement on Anti-dumping Measures 1994 Art 2.2.
27. Agreement on Anti-dumping Measures 1994 Art 2.3, 2.4.
28. Greg Mastel Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy (M.E. Sharpe, Inc, New York, 2001) 54.
29. Jianyu Wang “A Critique of the Application to China of the Non-market Economy Rules of Antidumping Legislation and Practice of the European Union” (1999) 33 J.W.T 3 117,131.
30. Commission Regulation(EEC) No. 3052/88 of 29 September 1988 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of paint, distemper, varnish and similar brushes originating in the P.R. of China, O.J.L 272, 4 October 1988, p.16; and Council Regulation (EEC) No. 725/89 of 20 March 1989 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of paint, distemper, varnish and similar brushes originating in the P.R. of China, O.J.L 79, 22 March 1989, p24. Case C-16/90, Nolle v. Hauptzollamt Bremen-Feibafen, (1991) ECR-1-5163.)
31. Brink Lindsy “The US Antidumping Law---Rhetoric versus Reality” (2000) 34 J.W.T. 1 1, 10.
32. Council Regulation(EC) No. 384/96 of 22 December 1995on protection aginst dumped imports from countries not menbers of the European Community, O.J.L 56, 6 March 1996, p 19.
33. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Preparing for Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Issues and Research Needs from a Development Perspective (United Nations, Geneva , 2001) 219.
34. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Preparing for Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Issues and Research Needs from a Development Perspective (United Nations, Geneva, 2001) 221.
35. Kofi Oteng Kufuor “the Developing Countries and the Shaping of GATT/WTO Antidumping Law” (1998) 32 J.W.T 6 167, 175.
36. Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Art 27.
37. Greg Mastel Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy (M.E. Sharpe, Inc, New York, 2001) 21-22
38. David Palmeter “A Commentary on the WTO Anti-Dumping Code” (1996) 30 J.W.T 4 43, 62.
39. Anti-dumping code 1994 Art 17.6(ii)
40. Kofi Oteng Kufuor “the Developing Countries and the Shaping of GATT/WTO Antidumping Law” (1998) 32 J.W.T 6 167, 185.
41. Greg Mastel Antidumping Laws and the US Economy (M.E. Sharp, New York, 2001) 26-27.
42. T. Ademola Oyejide Interests and Options of Developing and Least-developed Countries in a New Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (United Nations, Geneva, 2001) 24.
43. Arvind Panagariya The Millennium Round and Developing Countries: Negotiating Strategies and Areas of Benefits (United Nations, Geneva, 2001) 20.
44. Xin Zhiming Firms stand up to protect themselves China Daily (North American ed, New York, Apr 17, 2001 ) p4.
|
