|
[62]Debra Steger, Overview of WTO Dispute Settlement, Address at the 2nd Annual Conference of the World Trade Law Association: Liberalisation and Protection in the World Trading System (May 15, 1998).
[63]Kofi Oteng Kufour, From the GATT to the WTO – The Developing Countries and the Reform of the Procedures for the Settlement of International Trade Disputes, 31 J. World Trade, Oct. 1997, at 177.
[64]Supra note 27, at 1231.
[65]Peter Lichtenbaum, Dispute Settlement and Institutional Issues, Reactions to Seattle, 3 (1) J Int’l Econo L (2000), p174.
[66]Bhagirath Lal Das, The WTO Agreements: Deficiencies, Imbalances and Required Changes, 1998, p 9-12.
Bibliography
John H. Jackson, Dispute Settlement and the WTO Emerging Problems, 1 (3), J Int’l Econo L (1998), 330. The World Trading System, 109-11 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1997). 1995 Documents Supplement to Legal Problems of International Economic Relations, 446 (3d ed. 1995). Due Process in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, Address at the 2nd Annual Conference of the Word Trade Law Association: Liberalisation and Protectionism in the World Trading System (May 15, 1998).
Werner Zdouc, WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to the GATS, 2 (2) J Int’l Econo L (1999),
295.
Andrew W. Sboyer, The First Three Years of WTO Dispute Settlement: Observations and Suggestions, 1 (2), J Int’l Econo L (1998), 298.
Decision on the Application and Review of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Apr. 15, 1994, 33 I.L.M. 1125, 1259.
DSU, Articles 4.2-4.3, see World Trade Organization, The WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, A Collection of the Relevant Legal Texts, 2nd Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Hyun Chong Kim, The WTO Dispute Settlement Process: A Primer, 2 (3) J Int’l Econo L, 1999, 460.
Debra P. Steger and Susan M. Hainsworth, World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement: The First Three Years, 1 (2) J Int’l Econo L 1998, 201.
United Nations, Handbook on The Peaceful Settlement of Disputes Between States, 10 (1992) (OLA/COD/2394).
Final Act Embodying the Results of The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiation 353, 33 I.L.M. 1125 (1994).
European Communities, Discussion Paper on the Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). [hereinafter EC Discussion Paper].
Report of the Appellate Body on India-patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products, Dec. 19, 1997, WTO Doc. WT/DS50/AB/R. para. 94.
Jacques H. J. Bourgeois, Some Reflections on the WTO Dispute Settlement System from A Practitioner’s Perspective, 4 (1), J Int’l Econo L (2001) 146.
Debra Steger, Overview of WTO Dispute Settlement. Address at the 1998 Conference of the World Trade Law Association
Jansen, Selcted Problem Areas in the Course of a Dispute Settlement Procedure, Free World Trade and the European Union, 59 at 60 ( vol 28,Publications by the Academy of European Law in Tier, Bundesanzeiger, 2000).
Allan Rosas, EC and the WTO Dispute Settlement: Some Reflections on Practice and Doctrine, Presentation at the 37th Leiden-London Meeting (June 27, 1998).
Rudolf Ostrihansky, Chambers of the International Court of Justice, 37 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. (1988) 30, 43.
WTO Appellate Body Report on EC-Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, Sept. 9, 1997, WT/DS 27 AB/R, para. 142.
Debre P. Steger and Susan M. Hainsworth, World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement: The First Three Years, 1 (2) J Int’l Econo L (1998), 208.
David Palmeter, The WTO appellate Body Needs Remand Authority, 32, J. World Trade, Feb. 1998, p 41-44.
Debra Steger, Overview of WTO Dispute Settlement, Address at the 2nd Annual Conference of the World Trade Law Association: Liberalisation and Protection in the World Trading System (May 15, 1998).
|
